This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Don't completely scalarize a record if it contains bit-field (PR tree-optimization/45144)
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Interesting because we have this extact pass here at cavium. I can post
> the patch set that adds it to 4.3.3 if anyone wants to look at them.
Certainly seems like it would be helpful, assuming Cavium will assign
(650) 331-3385 x713