This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH for c++/44909 (confusion with circular lazy declaration)
On 15 Jul 2010, at 21:45, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/15/2010 04:25 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I'm about to revert that patch.
As promised, here's a completely different approach: rather than
rely on the incompleteness of the parameter type, we just disqualify
any constructor taking a different type. This isn't quite right,
but it avoids a regression, and a proper fix will need more
thanks, as you say that squashes the ObjC++ regression.
I'm trying to review what's being done in ObjC (on the basis that some
of it might no longer be correct/optimal).