This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Conflicting IRA patches
On 07/13/10 09:39, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 07/13/2010 05:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:Probably, but your patch has been pending a while and I wouldn't
consider it fair to force you to wait and deal with the fallout because
your patch wasn't reviewed in a timely manner.
I figured that the cover class stuff is probably more important.
My temptation is to place priority on the double-word stuff& speedups
to reduce the amount of divergence we're dealing with, then sort through
the issues the removal of cover classes introduces.
I can probably deal with the breakage if it goes in first.If you're willing, that's fine with me.
It would be good to have a review of the existing patch though, with aI'm looking at it right now. I haven't gotten to the meat of the patch
as I'm still pruning out the stuff that's obviously correct.
yes/no answer, before I spend a few days updating it to the new code.