This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, objc] maintenance, make Obj{C,C++} LTO-friendly.



On 10 Jul 2010, at 07:55, Mike Stump wrote:


On Jul 9, 2010, at 5:25 PM, IainS wrote:
On 9 Jul 2010, at 06:59, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:19 PM, IainS wrote:
This patch is intended to maintain the 'status-quo' in the presence of LTO.

OK for trunk?

[ after more thought and some more offline email... ]


Ok with the:

Well, I found the cause of our section hassles and fixed it as obvious (I hope that doesn't exceed the approval).

Yeah, I do like this version better... If we wanted to bullet proof this, we could assert that bss_initializer_p isn't true on the things that can't tolerate switching

given that this fixes a regression present on the introduction of LTO, and that LTO has been back-ported to 4.5
Is this eligible for backport to 4.5 with/without Nathan's VEC changes?


Iain


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]