This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: trunk patch: moving gimple_seq_node from coretypes.h to gimple.h
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: basile at starynkevitch dot net
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Joseph S.Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:32:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: trunk patch: moving gimple_seq_node from coretypes.h to gimple.h
- References: <1277231415.19557.20.camel@glinka>
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> since gimple_seq_node is not very useful in coretypes.h I bootstrapped
> the following attached patch to trunk rev.161214 on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with c,c++,lto languages.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog entry:
Ok with
+/* The types gimple & gimple_seq are defined in coretypes.h but
+ gimple_seq_node is not needed there. */
removed.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2010-06-22 ?Basile Starynkevitch ?<basile@starynkevitch.net>
> ? ? ? ?* coretypes.h (gimple_seq_node_d, gimple_seq_node)
> ? ? ? ?(const_gimple_seq_node): Removed typedefs.
>
> ? ? ? ?* gimple.h ?(gimple_seq_node_d, gimple_seq_node)
> ? ? ? ?(const_gimple_seq_node): Added typedefs moved from coretypes.h.
>
> See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-06/msg00670.html &
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-06/msg00657.html
>
> By the way, I would also happy if someone could also review the
> GNU-friendly gengtype patch
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02178.html
>
> Cheers
> --
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH ? ? ? ? http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
> email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
> 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
> *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
>
>