This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed^n patches: testsuite, x86
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Rainer Orth
<ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>>> Three patches of mine have remained unreviewed for a long time despite
>>> several reminders:
>>>
>>> ? ? ?[testsuite] Require -march=i[45]86 on several tests
>>> ? ? ? ? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00589.html
>>>
>>> Needs either a testsuite maintainer or someone familiar with the
>>> tree-ssa testcases, or perhaps an x86 maintainer?
>>>
>>> ? ? ?PATCH: Clear hardware capabilities from gcc.target/i386 executables with Sun ld
>>> ? ? ?http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00985.html
>>>
>>> ? ? ?PATCH: Skip some UCN tests unless supported
>>> ? ? ?http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00987.html
>>>
>>> I'm only requesting approval for a 4.4 backport. ?Both patches live on
>>> mainline and the 4.5 branch for quite some time and fix a large number
>>> of spurious testsuite failures.
>>
>> If there are no problems on 4.5/4.6, you are free to backport the last
>> two approved patches to 4.4. They are testsuite patches, so rest assured
>> that all fallout will be immediately noticed.
>
> Ok, thanks. ?I didn't know this is a general rule, but it makes sense
> obviously.
>
> Any opinion on the first patch, btw?
Unfortunately, no. I have no idea what dumps are correct for
-ftree-loop-linear and why they require -march=i386 on x86.
Uros.