This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR44555


On 16/06/2010 21:47, Dave Korn wrote:

> address from the loaded data item!  This happens because the '&' operator is
> really a compile-time operation like sizeof, whereas a dereference is a
> runtime one; 

  That made me wonder, what does the standard say about "sizeof (*(TYPE
*)NULL)"?  It looks to me like it's probably also undefined.  On the other
hand, I found a footnote (#87 in n1256, on section 6.5.3.2 para 4) that says

> &*E is equivalent to E (even if E is a null pointer)

so I figure that's more or less precedent for allowing &(A->B) even if A is a
null pointer.

    cheers,
      DaveK


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]