This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: license & copyright patch to MELT for dual GPLv3+ & GFDL1.2+
- From: karl at freefriends dot org (Karl Berry)
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 20:19:43 GMT
- Subject: Re: license & copyright patch to MELT for dual GPLv3+ & GFDL1.2+
Meanwhile, I think we should try to make use of the fact that RMS is
permitting auto-generated reference documentation (which I have been
instructed not to call a manual) using JavaDoc/Doxygen tools.
I'm very glad to hear it. I was not aware of this.
What is/are the license/s of the sources and the derived doc?
Is he saying that it's ok to use the GPL for the derived doc because
it's "not a manual"?
Thanks,
Karl