This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ping: [Patch/RFC]: Fix for rs6000.c/print_operand

From: Gunther Nikl <gnikl at users dot sourceforge dot net>
To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:23:03 +0200
Subject: Re: Ping: [Patch/RFC]: Fix for rs6000.c/print_operand
References: <4BDF0A73.2030803@users.sourceforge.net> <4C0693F4.8040305@users.sourceforge.net> <AANLkTiloDxhMsZ_XumKic78lhnouS3F79ySLRq69aBmv@mail.gmail.com>

David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Gunther Nikl
> <gnikl@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00144.html
>>
>> Any comments?
> 
> This patch is okay, but the ChangeLog is incorrect.  This is a change
> to print_operand case 'K', not to print_operand_address.

Shall I resend the patch with an updated ChangeLog entry?

What about http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00640.html which
changes the same place that my patch touches?

Regards,
Gunther

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ping: [Patch/RFC]: Fix for rs6000.c/print_operand
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Ping: [Patch/RFC]: Fix for rs6000.c/print_operand
  - From: Gunther Nikl
- Re: Ping: [Patch/RFC]: Fix for rs6000.c/print_operand
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]