This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Hookize GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Anatoly Sokolov <aesok at post dot ru>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 14:02:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookize GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS
References: <08741006.20100506210318@post.ru> <AANLkTil8rX5CVAjrj8tNM-3Fz6VRTW-3-4c3ugjadAH2@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/13/2010 06:37 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

2010/5/6 Anatoly Sokolov<aesok@post.ru>:

Hello.

This patch turns GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS into a hook.
  The patch has been bootstrapped and regression tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.


This broke powerpc:
  /Users/regress/tbox/svn-gcc/gcc/targhooks.c:968:3: error: passing
argument 1 of 'rs6000_mode_dependent_address_ptr' discards qualifiers
from pointer target type [-Werror]
   /Users/regress/tbox/svn-gcc/gcc/targhooks.c:968:3: note: expected
'rtx' but argument is of type 'const_rtx'

Anatoly, can you commit the obvious patch:

-  GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS (addr, win);
+  GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS ((rtx) addr, win);

?

Thanks!

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Hookize GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH] Hookize GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS
  - From: Anatoly Sokolov
- Re: [PATCH] Hookize GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]