This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Jim Wilson <wilson at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:18:46 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
References: <1271302485.2620.67.camel@localhost> <4BC6B623.9020206@gnu.org> <1271317451.2620.96.camel@localhost> <4BC6E5DF.6000901@gnu.org> <1271395259.2629.37.camel@localhost> <20100416052514.GB7547@gmx.de> <1271398146.2629.85.camel@localhost>

On 04/16/2010 08:09 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:

There is also still the problem that -Wa and -Wp are inconsistent with
-Wl, because -Wa and -Wp silently ignore empty strings, while -Wl does
not.

I missed that, this one is indeed a bug.

Paolo

References:
- [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: [PATCH, driver] -Wl, passing empty strings to ld
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]