This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog?
- From: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:30:10 -0600
- Subject: Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog?
- References: <20100326001316.GA11063@bromo.med.uc.edu> <20100327065613.GA25518@gmx.de> <20100327171734.GA26098@bromo.med.uc.edu> <cb9d34b21003271838x40f56504q2594903836530c87@mail.gmail.com> <20100328151408.GA26373@gmx.de> <cb9d34b21003280948q1e09590fsb3d0acd3fb8bf140@mail.gmail.com> <cb9d34b21003281040v1096372exd16e11817d5ef16c@mail.gmail.com> <l2jcb9d34b21004020934s7e53e17u5bcc3f960199eb9e@mail.gmail.com> <4BB620C3.2080702@gnu.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1004021901040.5522@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:01, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 04/02/2010 06:34 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to ping these two patches.
>> > Paolo, would these two patches be ok for trunk?
>>
>> What the RMs say.
>
> Ok with a proper changelog entry.
Sorry, I did not saw that the second patch missed the ChangeLog.
* configure.ac: Add brackets around AC_TRY_COMPILE alternative.
* configure: Regenerated.
The two patches passed bootstrap and test on amd64-linux,
configured with "--with-cloog --with-ppl" and the CLooG-PPL installed
on that machine was 0.15.9. I will commit these two patches to trunk.
Sebastian