This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR debug/43325

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:32:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR debug/43325
References: <20100331094403.GD20524@redhat.com> <4BB38219.5010201@redhat.com> <20100331192207.GE20524@redhat.com> <4BB3BCDE.6020906@redhat.com> <20100401131543.GG20524@redhat.com>

On 04/01/2010 09:15 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 05:21:34PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Good point.  We don't want to emit anything for the automatic file
scope decl of static data members.
Maybe context_die != old_die->die_parent&& context_die != comp_unit_die?
I think we don't want to emit duplicates at namespace scope either

True. Just go ahead with your first patch, then. Do put the test in c-c++-common as Jakub suggests.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] PR debug/43325
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [PATCH] PR debug/43325
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- Re: [PATCH] PR debug/43325
  - From: Dodji Seketeli

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]