This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Fix DW_CFA_expression handling in dwarf2out (PR debug/43540)


Hi!

When writing output_cfis routine, I've missed that DW_CFA_expression
was using reverse order of arguments (operand 1 for location, operand 2 for
regnum) compared to what DWARF says.  I think it is better to use the
order of arguments that the standard has, everything else will lead to
similar errors like I've made (output_cfis would use first operand of
DW_CFA_expression like for many other opcodes as regnum when pushing into a
vector).

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2010-03-26  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR debug/43540
	* dwarf2out.c (reg_save): For DW_CFA_expression put regnum
	into first operand and location into second.
	(dw_cfi_oprnd1_desc): Return dw_cfi_oprnd_reg_num instead of
	dw_cfi_oprnd_loc for DW_CFA_expression.
	(dw_cfi_oprnd2_desc): Return dw_cfi_oprnd_loc for DW_CFA_expression.
	(output_cfa_loc, output_cfa_loc_raw): For DW_CFA_expression
	assume first argument is regnum and second argument is location.

--- gcc/dwarf2out.c.jj	2010-03-26 14:54:05.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/dwarf2out.c	2010-03-26 16:40:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -1115,8 +1115,8 @@ reg_save (const char *label, unsigned in
       && sreg == INVALID_REGNUM)
     {
       cfi->dw_cfi_opc = DW_CFA_expression;
-      cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd2.dw_cfi_reg_num = reg;
-      cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_loc
+      cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_reg_num = reg;
+      cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd2.dw_cfi_loc
 	= build_cfa_aligned_loc (offset, fde->stack_realignment);
     }
   else if (sreg == INVALID_REGNUM)
@@ -2911,6 +2911,7 @@ dw_cfi_oprnd1_desc (enum dwarf_call_fram
     case DW_CFA_same_value:
     case DW_CFA_def_cfa_register:
     case DW_CFA_register:
+    case DW_CFA_expression:
       return dw_cfi_oprnd_reg_num;
 
     case DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset:
@@ -2919,7 +2920,6 @@ dw_cfi_oprnd1_desc (enum dwarf_call_fram
       return dw_cfi_oprnd_offset;
 
     case DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression:
-    case DW_CFA_expression:
       return dw_cfi_oprnd_loc;
 
     default:
@@ -2946,6 +2946,9 @@ dw_cfi_oprnd2_desc (enum dwarf_call_fram
     case DW_CFA_register:
       return dw_cfi_oprnd_reg_num;
 
+    case DW_CFA_expression:
+      return dw_cfi_oprnd_loc;
+
     default:
       return dw_cfi_oprnd_unused;
     }
@@ -5193,10 +5196,14 @@ output_cfa_loc (dw_cfi_ref cfi)
   unsigned long size;
 
   if (cfi->dw_cfi_opc == DW_CFA_expression)
-    dw2_asm_output_data (1, cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd2.dw_cfi_reg_num, NULL);
+    {
+      dw2_asm_output_data (1, cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_reg_num, NULL);
+      loc = cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd2.dw_cfi_loc;
+    }
+  else
+    loc = cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_loc;
 
   /* Output the size of the block.  */
-  loc = cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_loc;
   size = size_of_locs (loc);
   dw2_asm_output_data_uleb128 (size, NULL);
 
@@ -5213,10 +5220,14 @@ output_cfa_loc_raw (dw_cfi_ref cfi)
   unsigned long size;
 
   if (cfi->dw_cfi_opc == DW_CFA_expression)
-    fprintf (asm_out_file, "0x%x,", cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd2.dw_cfi_reg_num);
+    {
+      fprintf (asm_out_file, "0x%x,", cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_reg_num);
+      loc = cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd2.dw_cfi_loc;
+    }
+  else
+    loc = cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_loc;
 
   /* Output the size of the block.  */
-  loc = cfi->dw_cfi_oprnd1.dw_cfi_loc;
   size = size_of_locs (loc);
   dw2_asm_output_data_uleb128_raw (size);
   fputc (',', asm_out_file);

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]