This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:08:13 +0100
- Subject: Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy
- References: <20100317160646.GA12942@redhat.com> <20100317163254.GC2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <84fc9c001003170951r4f2d7649i995b8da119e4ee62@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c001003170954u1244f113k6eb36194ed70a90e@mail.gmail.com> <20100317172844.GB14093@redhat.com> <84fc9c001003171040p1ef016far6dbfac306ab7e03c@mail.gmail.com> <20100317202629.GD2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20100317220805.GA22047@redhat.com> <20100317222902.GC3601@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20100318145743.GA15585@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Hi!
1) as cfgexpand.c will need to call the same function, the new routine
shouldn't live in dwarf2out.c, instead varasm.c or cfgexpand.c
2) I wouldn't do this conditionally on flag_compare_debug, make_decl_rtl
doesn't need to be called at all in -g0 case and I think we should better
avoid having any aliasing changes.
Jakub