This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
*PING* Re: [Patch, Fortran, 4.6] Coarray 5/n: Some coarray declaration fixes
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
- To: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:24 +0100
- Subject: *PING* Re: [Patch, Fortran, 4.6] Coarray 5/n: Some coarray declaration fixes
- References: <4B90BA35.2050001@net-b.de>
*PING*
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-03/msg00032.html
On 5 March 2010 09:00, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> when writing the first patch, I did some misreading of the standard.
>
> a) Even for assumed-shape arrays, the codimensions have to be assumed
> size - except if the coarray is allocatable. The check moved from
> array.c to resolve.c; I also moved down one test and added an "else if"
> to prevent two error message for the same problem.
>
> b) I misread ultimate component; thus one can have a coarray of derived
> type, which contains as component (1) an derived type with a coarray
> component (2). If the former component (1) is allocatable or a pointer.
>
> c) In one check, I missed a "c->allocatable".
>
> Build on x86-64-linux and currently regtesting.
> OK for the 4.6 stage1?
>
> Tobias
>