This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] add type of operand for REAL_CST to comment

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
Cc: Jerry Quinn <jlquinn at optonline dot net>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:48:07 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch] add type of operand for REAL_CST to comment
References: <1265488750.3796.558.camel@cerberus.qb5.org> <206fcf961002061439l27a02deft856c738051060340@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis <dosreis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jerry Quinn <jlquinn@optonline.net> wrote:
>> OK for trunk? ?I'm assuming even stuff like this should be OK'd when the
>> trunk is locked down.
>
> Doesn't the ?type depend on the front-end?

No, but other tree codes also do not have the type of the field documented
in tree.def.  The documentation usually resides in tree.h alongside the
accessor macro (and indeed it is there in the REAL_CST case).

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] add type of operand for REAL_CST to comment
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- [patch] add type of operand for REAL_CST to comment
  - From: Jerry Quinn
- Re: [patch] add type of operand for REAL_CST to comment
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]