This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary VLA restriction in copy_forbidden (PR middle-end/42874)
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:05:21 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary VLA restriction in copy_forbidden (PR middle-end/42874)
- References: <20100127114603.GB2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, this check has been added many years ago when
> tree-inline.c didn't handle VL type remapping properly.
> GCC until 4.4 has been ignoring this restriction for always_inline
> functions, and inlining them successfully, and OpenMP code remaps such types
> for years as well.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2010-01-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR middle-end/42874
> * tree-inline.c (cannot_copy_type_1): Removed.
> (copy_forbidden): Don't forbid copying of functions containing
> records/unions with variable length fields.
>
> * gcc.dg/vla-22.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/tree-inline.c.jj 2010-01-20 13:58:18.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree-inline.c 2010-01-27 09:52:55.000000000 +0100
> @@ -2730,39 +2730,6 @@ has_label_address_in_static_1 (tree *nod
> return NULL_TREE;
> }
>
> -/* Callback through walk_tree. Determine if we've got an aggregate
> - type that we can't support; return non-null if so. */
> -
> -static tree
> -cannot_copy_type_1 (tree *nodep, int *walk_subtrees ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> - void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> -{
> - tree t, node = *nodep;
> -
> - if (TREE_CODE (node) == RECORD_TYPE || TREE_CODE (node) == UNION_TYPE)
> - {
> - /* We cannot inline a function of the form
> -
> - void F (int i) { struct S { int ar[i]; } s; }
> -
> - Attempting to do so produces a catch-22.
> - If walk_tree examines the TYPE_FIELDS chain of RECORD_TYPE/
> - UNION_TYPE nodes, then it goes into infinite recursion on a
> - structure containing a pointer to its own type. If it doesn't,
> - then the type node for S doesn't get adjusted properly when
> - F is inlined.
> -
> - ??? This is likely no longer true, but it's too late in the 4.0
> - cycle to try to find out. This should be checked for 4.1. */
> - for (t = TYPE_FIELDS (node); t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
> - if (variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (t), NULL))
> - return node;
> - }
> -
> - return NULL_TREE;
> -}
> -
> -
> /* Determine if the function can be copied. If so return NULL. If
> not return a string describng the reason for failure. */
>
> @@ -2805,16 +2772,6 @@ copy_forbidden (struct function *fun, tr
> "address of local label in a static variable");
> goto fail;
> }
> -
> - if (!TREE_STATIC (decl) && !DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
> - && variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (decl), NULL)
> - && walk_tree_without_duplicates (&TREE_TYPE (decl),
> - cannot_copy_type_1, NULL))
> - {
> - reason = G_("function %q+F can never be copied "
> - "because it uses variable sized variables");
> - goto fail;
> - }
> }
>
> fail:
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vla-22.c.jj 2010-01-27 10:00:54.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vla-22.c 2010-01-27 10:03:46.000000000 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +extern void bar (int *);
> +
> +static inline __attribute__((always_inline))
> +int
> +foo (int i)
> +{
> + struct S {
> + int ar[1][i];
> + } s;
> +
> + s.ar[0][0] = 0;
> + bar (&s.ar[0][0]);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +baz (int i)
> +{
> + foo (i + 2);
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
>
--
Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Novell / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex