This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: hook doc patch (61/112): TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_SPEC_DS, TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_CHECKED_DS, TARGET_SCHED_SKIP_RTX_P
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Joern Rennecke wrote:
>> And couldn't we just say
>>
>> * tm.texi (TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_SPEC_DS,
>> TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_CHECKED_DS, TARGET_SCHED_SKIP_RTX_P):
>> Document.
> Please take this up with Richard Kenner, he told me something 1995-ish
> not to do that.
Okay, then let's leave it as is. I don't feel sufficiently strongly about
this (and the GNU coding standards actually suggest closing each line with
")" and starting again with "(" when it comes to multiple functions, so my
original proposal wouldn't be right from that perspective).
Gerald