This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Request for code review - (ZEE patch : Redundant Zero extension elimination)
- From: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google dot com>
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:55:01 -0800
- Subject: Re: Request for code review - (ZEE patch : Redundant Zero extension elimination)
- References: <4B4E1F14.7020508@gmail.com>
Hi Richard,
With regards to your comments in :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-12/msg00028.html
>> " which also did something stupid like move the patch down into the i386 subdirectory. It'll never be applied in that form if I have anything to say on the subject, because obviously this is a generic sort of optimization. "
I moved it to i386 based on comments from Paolo and Richard Guenther.
I really don't care where the patch goes and I was just doing what
Paolo and Richard felt strongly about at that time about this being
very specific to x86 and using x86 patterns.
We could come to a consensus on this and I am more than willing to
move it back if necessary.
Please let me know what you think,
Thanks,
-Sriraman.
2010/1/13 Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>:
> Hello!
>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> ? ? Can you take a look at this patch when you find the time ? This is
>> being blocked needing an approval from a x86 backend maintainer and
>> you are the only one listed in the MAINTAINERS file.
>>
>
> Please see [1].
>
> [And your MAINTAINERS file is out of date, BTW ;) ]
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-12/msg00028.html
>
> Uros.
>