This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/21772 part 3
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:23:34 +0100
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/21772 part 3
- References: <20091215214406.2a2f5348@mcgee.artheist.org> <20091217012815.392cbeff@mcgee.artheist.org> <20091231200031.773295ed@redhat.com> <4B3DCD38.2020800@oracle.com> <4B3DDCEE.7030509@oracle.com>
On 01/01/2010 12:30 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Turns out I was missing that we are testing *only* in C++0x mode. I have
> re-added the tests, sorry. Still, to be honest, I think we are pretty
> sloppy in making sure we are instantiating with types strictly of
> literal type only, actually, I'm pretty sure we aren't. But we can fix that.
>
... also, some C++ front-end work is necessary to adjust the treatment
of unions for C++0x (vs literal types as data members, in particular)
Paolo.