This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Version script vs. mangled names on systems where size_type != unsigned int
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:05:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: Version script vs. mangled names on systems where size_type != unsigned int
- References: <4B2A0AA2.1020003@gmail.com> <4B2A07A5.60100@oracle.com> <4B2A2196.8080203@gmail.com> <4B2A32ED.30104@gmail.com> <4B2A3203.5030503@oracle.com> <4B2A3D62.3030209@gmail.com>
On 12/17/2009 03:17 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> I really can't see any sensible place to do that; there's absolutely
> nothing
> documenting what any of the other parts and sub-parts of patterns mean and if
> I'm describing 'x' and 'y' it's going to be by contrasting them with 'i' and
> 'j' ... which also aren't described anywhere. If you have a good suggestion,
> I'll run with it when I commit, but otherwise I think I'd rather just let the
> changelog speak for itself.
>
Actually we *should* have something documenting the patterns, patches
welcome ;)
For now, just one line right before the first occurrence (and saying
"... and below") will do.
Thanks,
Paolo.