This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ping2] Re: [ping] Re: [patch] PR40134, use a linker script on arm-linux to link with -lgcc_s -lgcc
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCJ-patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:57:43 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ping2] Re: [ping] Re: [patch] PR40134, use a linker script on arm-linux to link with -lgcc_s -lgcc
- References: <4A530F5C.4040500@ubuntu.com> <20090707091425.GB4462@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4A5B32BB.5010308@ubuntu.com> <20090909112436.GV14664@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4AAA8510.8060906@ubuntu.com> <4AB8C07D.3010807@ubuntu.com> <4AB8F3C2.60909@redhat.com> <4ABB2CB3.8090800@ubuntu.com> <4ABB30DE.6050502@redhat.com> <4ABB3BE6.4060800@ubuntu.com> <4ABB4C9B.3070200@redhat.com> <1255527525.4842.29.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4ADF0B67.9070505@ubuntu.com> <4AEA2FF1.6060508@ubuntu.com> <4AEA3318.6060607@oracle.com> <4AEF025A.5060403@ubuntu.com> <4AEF08BF.4020500@oracle.com> <4AFC5187.2010909@ubuntu.com> <4AFC54A0.7080109@oracle.com> <4B1F7F16.8050708@ubuntu.com> <4B1F80DF.5020402@oracle.com> <4B21C863.405@ubuntu.com>
On 12/11/2009 05:19 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> the attached patch enables the link tests on linux, kfreebsd, and hurd
> targets. checked with the (Debian) kfreebsd and hurd maintainers that
> this is the right thing to do (although there doesn't exist an active
> port of these on arm or hppa. tested on i486-linux-gnu,
> arm-linux-gnueabi and hppa-linux-gnu. ok for the trunk?
First, thanks Matthias for your patience on this issue.
The patch looks very nice to me, just wait one day or so for comments
and then go ahead, patch is approved for mainline.
If you want, I would suggest adding a one-line comment in the code, say,
after " # Do link tests if possible, instead asm tests, limited to some
platforms", mentioning the PRs, these thorny issues about libgcc...
Thanks again,
Paolo.