This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ping: [PATCH] RFA: Add a small indication to warnings that are promoted to errors


http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg01101.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg01197.html

Anyone care to give this patch the thumbs up or down?? I'll take a
decision on either of the two variants of this.

The first variant appends "[was warning]" to the end of the
diagnostic.? Visually somewhat unappealing, but unlikely to cause
problems for scripts that parse gcc diagnostics.

The second variant changes the diagnostic's intro from "error:" to
"error: warning:".? Visually more consistent, but potentially a
problem for scripts that parse gcc output.

Thanks.

--
Google UK Limited | Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham
Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ | Registered in England Number: 3977902


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]