This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR c++/141777
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:11:38AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I was thinking that we didn't need a new tree node, just change the
> template_info fields in lang_decl_min and lang_type_class to be a new
> type, i.e. a pointer to your template_info_s.
The reason why I went for a tree node is that quite some places expect
template_info to be a tree. So it was much easier to just wrap it in a tree.
Should I go ahead nevertheless and use template_info_s instead?
Dodji