This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [vta, graphite, PR41888, PR41886] get graphite to work with VTA
On Nov 17, 2009, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:
> No. The change that I suggested has nothing to do with graphite
Err, no. You're suggesting changes to code copied from graphite and
then slightly tweaked. The original code could be optimized in just the
same way.
I've already offered fixes for graphite to work with VTA, which was my
duty. Optimizing preexisting graphite code is not. If you want the
copied code to be optimized before it goes in, feel free to pick it up
from where I left.
In general I wouldn't mind helping out while learning more about
compiler passes I'm not familiar with, but I have more urgent matters to
tend to right now.
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
- References:
- [vta, graphite, PR41888, PR41886] get graphite to work with VTA
- Re: [vta, graphite, PR41888, PR41886] get graphite to work with VTA
- Re: [vta, graphite, PR41888, PR41886] get graphite to work with VTA
- Re: [vta, graphite, PR41888, PR41886] get graphite to work with VTA