This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] Fix MIPS LHX in mips-dsp.md


> 
>   Thanks for the info!  I am testing GCC mainline with 
> -mips32r2/-mdspr2.
> This configuration should catch the lhx bug.
> 

  Tests on trunk are done.

(OLD TEST RESULTS)
                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            53753
# of unexpected failures        58
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          79
# of unresolved testcases       12
# of unsupported tests          657
/home/fu/dev/gcc45/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.5.0 20091112 (experimental) [trunk
revision 154111] (GCC)

(NEW TEST RESULTS)
                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            53755
# of unexpected failures        56
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          79
# of unresolved testcases       12
# of unsupported tests          657
/home/fu/dev/gcc45/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.5.0 20091112 (experimental) [trunk
revision 154111] (GCC)


# diff oldtests/gcc/gcc.sum newtests/gcc/gcc.sum
1c1
< Test Run By fu on Thu Nov 12 13:53:07 2009
---
> Test Run By fu on Thu Nov 12 11:07:13 2009
53893c53893
< FAIL: gcc.target/mips/dsp-lhx.c scan-assembler \tlhx\t
---
> PASS: gcc.target/mips/dsp-lhx.c scan-assembler \tlhx\t
53895c53895
< FAIL: gcc.target/mips/dsp-no-lhx.c scan-assembler-not \tlhx\t
---
> PASS: gcc.target/mips/dsp-no-lhx.c scan-assembler-not \tlhx\t
54671,54672c54671,54672
< # of expected passes          53753
< # of unexpected failures      58
---
> # of expected passes          53755
> # of unexpected failures      56

  Do test results look ok?  Thanks!

Regards,
Chao-ying


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]