This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[committed] Fix a pasto in i386 %Y diagnostics
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:39:57 +0100
- Subject: [committed] Fix a pasto in i386 %Y diagnostics
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Hi!
I've noticed a pasto introduced in XOP changes, for %Y without condition
code we shouldn't complain about operand code D.
Also, the lines were too long.
Committed as obvious.
2009-11-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (print_operand) <case 'D'>: Fix formatting.
(print_operand) <case 'Y'>: Likewise. Fix a pasto in operand lossage
diagnostics.
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj 2009-11-08 19:17:09.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2009-11-09 14:33:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -11597,7 +11597,8 @@ print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int co
fputs ("ord", file);
break;
default:
- output_operand_lossage ("operand is not a condition code, invalid operand code 'D'");
+ output_operand_lossage ("operand is not a condition code, "
+ "invalid operand code 'D'");
return;
}
}
@@ -11636,7 +11637,8 @@ print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int co
fputs ("ord", file);
break;
default:
- output_operand_lossage ("operand is not a condition code, invalid operand code 'D'");
+ output_operand_lossage ("operand is not a condition code, "
+ "invalid operand code 'D'");
return;
}
}
@@ -11810,7 +11812,8 @@ print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int co
fputs ("une", file);
break;
default:
- output_operand_lossage ("operand is not a condition code, invalid operand code 'D'");
+ output_operand_lossage ("operand is not a condition code, "
+ "invalid operand code 'Y'");
return;
}
return;
Jakub