This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: revised patch committed.

From: Amir Gonnen <amirgonnen at gmail dot com>
To: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Kenneth dot Zadeck at naturalbridge dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:33:33 +0200
Subject: Re: revised patch committed.
References: <df56f4570911040438p65601a3cu5e650e0b54889cf4@mail.gmail.com> <87skctn9ss.fsf@moria.site> <df56f4570911050728s114f1044ybe9ac94149d423fd@mail.gmail.com> <f865508f0911050750i771eeaacxbbd9ec22814de75c@mail.gmail.com> <df56f4570911050810p341aa48ayd6805a6849abd361@mail.gmail.com> <4AF3026D.8070704@naturalbridge.com> <df56f4570911050910t298c97f2p8f7a639dc40e012b@mail.gmail.com> <4AF30968.90307@naturalbridge.com>

It works for me.
What is the process of submitting that patch?

The benefits would be:
1. A future port will be able to use zero_extract on set dest.
2. I will not need to re-apply these patches every time I update my
port to a newer gcc version.

Thanks,

Amir

>
> i think that something like that should work.
>
> kenny

Follow-Ups:
- Re: revised patch committed.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

References:
- fwprop and zero_extract
  - From: Amir Gonnen
- revised patch committed.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: revised patch committed.
  - From: Amir Gonnen
- Re: revised patch committed.
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: revised patch committed.
  - From: Amir Gonnen
- Re: revised patch committed.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: revised patch committed.
  - From: Amir Gonnen
- Re: revised patch committed.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]