This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] PR c++/41020

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:14:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFA] PR c++/41020
References: <20091023193035.GQ30620@adjoa.torimasen.com> <4AE20CEB.6050608@redhat.com> <20091023212753.GS30620@adjoa.torimasen.com> <4AE24176.1020806@redhat.com>

Jason Merrill wrote:

> In any case, a friend declaration should not match a builtin
> declaration.  It shouldn't give an error, either, it should declare a
> different function.

  How do I make a non-friend declaration for that "different" function, so
that I can specify an extern C "previous linkage" for the friend declaration
to "retain"?

    cheers,
      DaveK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] PR c++/41020
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [RFA] PR c++/41020
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] PR c++/41020
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [RFA] PR c++/41020
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] PR c++/41020
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]