This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][LTO] Re-set boolean_type_node in free_lang_data

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:22:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH][LTO] Re-set boolean_type_node in free_lang_data
References: <84fc9c000907101225w7a6b1cc1h19d2181c07303993@mail.gmail.com> <200910151528.49668.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <84fc9c000910150644q708e7974x8166dbb106d3f69c@mail.gmail.com> <200910151551.04855.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> And yes, this was done for the benefit of fortran - C interoperability.
>> Fortran has all kinds of different precision boolean types.
>
> I presume it's not possible/easy to set boolean_type_node to the C-compatible
> one from the start?

You mean like Ada does?

;)

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][LTO] Re-set boolean_type_node in free_lang_data
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: [PATCH][LTO] Re-set boolean_type_node in free_lang_data
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH][LTO] Re-set boolean_type_node in free_lang_data
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH][LTO] Re-set boolean_type_node in free_lang_data
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]