This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix PR target/33743 (2/2)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:47:39 +0200
Subject: Re: Fix PR target/33743 (2/2)
References: <200910091640.35389.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <253736F0-CE74-4908-9705-4F936126BE2E@adacore.com>

> > This is the second part of the fix, for SPARC/SPARC64 Solaris.
>
> +  /* This is the observed pattern for the sigacthandler in Solaris
> 8.  */
> +  unsigned int sigacthandler_sol8_pattern []
> +    = {0x9401400f, 0xca5aafa0, 0x913e2000, 0x892a3003,
> +       0xe0590005, 0x9fc40000, 0x9410001a, 0x80a6e008};
> +
> +  /* This is the observed pattern for the sigacthandler in Solaris
> 9.  */
> +  unsigned int sigacthandler_sol9_pattern []
> +    = {0xa33e2000, 0x00000000, 0x892c7003, 0x90100011,
> +       0xe0590005, 0x9fc40000, 0x9410001a, 0x80a46008};
> ...
>
> Shouldn't these variables be 'static const' ?

I don't think so, they are broken up and entirely folded.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- Fix PR target/33743 (2/2)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Fix PR target/33743 (2/2)
  - From: Tristan Gingold

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]