This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch i386]: PR/41315 frame.padding0 isn't treat in all cases of i386

On 09/09/2009 02:09 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hello,

I reviewed the prologue/epilogue handling of w64 ABI in 386 -as we
just had found an failure here in treating stack padding - and I found
that the padding0 field was inconsitant handled.

ChangeLog

2009-09-09 Kai Tietz<kai.tietz@onevision.com>

	* config/i386.c (ix86_can_use_return_insn_p): Check for
	padding0, too.
	(ix86_expand_prologue): Take frame.padding0 into logic of
	to_allloc checks.
	(ix86_expand_epilogue): Likewise.

I regression tested patches (one for 4.4, on for trunk) for
x86_64-pc-mingw32 and for x86_64-pc-linux64.
Ok for apply to head and 4.4 branch?

AFAICS, frame.padding0 is cygwin/mingw thing, so you can approve it yourself ;)

Uros.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]