This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] [Revised] libiberty hashtab.c:hash_pointer() needs intptr_t
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Cc: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:47:23 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Revised] libiberty hashtab.c:hash_pointer() needs intptr_t
- References: <647fe9b10909030238q29cc9b81uf9cbdd6e2cc49e36@mail.gmail.com> <m3r5uogf9w.fsf@google.com>
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Ian Lance Taylor<iant@google.com> wrote:
> Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This is the revised version of a previously OK'ed[1] but unapplied patch;
>> configure is now regenerated for autoconf 2.64. ?OK for trunk? ?[I don't
>> have svn write access.]
>>
>> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00780.html
>>
>> --
>>
>> 2009-09-03 ?Ozkan Sezer ?<sezeroz@gmail.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? PR target/39065
>> ? ? ? * configure.ac: Also check for intptr_t.
>> ? ? ? * config.h.in: Regenerated.
>> ? ? ? * configure: Regenerated.
>> ? ? ? * hashtab.c (hash_pointer): Cast the pointer argument to intptr_t
>> ? ? ? instead of of long.
>
> I already OK'ed this patch. ?It's still OK.
>
> Anybody want to volunteer to apply it?
>
Checked into gcc and src.
--
H.J.