This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: r150960 changed ltmain.sh and broke the build
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, davek at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, Mook - <mook dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:09:41 +0100
- Subject: Re: r150960 changed ltmain.sh and broke the build
- References: <b609cb3b0908260211q4ca347efw94f4e420d1ac5efc@mail.gmail.com> <4A950CFE.7060709@gmail.com> <4A950C2A.8040204@gnu.org> <4A9510BA.1030704@gmail.com> <4A9512E2.9010104@gmail.com> <4A9512B5.50005@gnu.org> <4A951673.1020108@gmail.com> <4A9517A1.10507@gmail.com> <4A951F1E.4060503@gmail.com> <4A95210B.3050603@gnu.org>
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>>> Paolo, is this OK if I test it just by restrapping all the target
>>> libs in an
>>> existing $objdir and checking it then all installs correctly?
> Yes. @ is fine.
Bootstrap finished, install was correct, generated .la files contained
correct paths; installed at r.151124, with the entries in the correct
ChangeLogs(*).
NightStrike, it should all be OK now. Thanks for the headsup.
cheers,
DaveK
--
(*) - because I didn't write "gcc/libjava/classpath/ChangeLog" when I posted
the patch, but just "libjava/classpath/ChangeLog", that made the
"gcc/ChangeLog" ambiguous; for the sake of clarity, I meant "gcc/ChangeLog" as
opposed to "gcc/gcc/ChangeLog".