This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Dodji Seketeli wrote:

>> I noticed that gcj was emitting some "unnamed" methods for the class
>> java.lang.String. I am not sure what those methods are. Maybe the
>> contructors ? I am talking about the methods represented the DIE 0x88, for
>> instance. In any case, before this patch, gcj was emitting the string "()"
>> as method name, in the .debug_pubnames section. Now with the patch, it just
>> emits an empty string. This is weird, but I think the patch doesn't make
>> the situation worse.
> 
> I don't know.  I'll have a look.

It's quite explicit:

	  if (! DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (node))
	    put_decl_node (DECL_NAME (node));

So, constructors don't have names.  What does C++ do for constructors?

Andrew.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]