This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Merging Graphite to trunk
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Li Feng <nemokingdom at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Merging Graphite to trunk
- References: <cb9d34b20907300016m481fabdciedc6c2ce22100c1d@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907301250430.16347@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <cb9d34b20907300951n7c0349a2q9306b60d7a6b2a8e@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907311103270.16347@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <cb9d34b20907311032p6da10a33v5c63a3c868baaa2c@mail.gmail.com> <cb9d34b20907311039s1ef74048sd142ca3c3546741d@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907311940120.16347@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <cb9d34b20907311103h6074c55cqbcab7c2d0bf77a77@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:41, Richard Guenther<rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >> What about renaming -fgraphite-force-parallel into -floop-parallelize-all?
> >> We could have -floop-parallelize for the version with cost model.
> >> These would be consistent with the flag names of the other loop transforms
> >> exposed from Graphite.
> >
> > Certainly better than -fgraphite-force-parallel.
>
> Done like this. Okay for trunk after regstrap?
Yes. Thanks,
Richard.