This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md

From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:57:04 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md
References: <303e1d290907140611n7c3461c6u6539756086803837@mail.gmail.com> <44bc43d50907140647q42bfcfc8sc1ebbc3d85f7c129@mail.gmail.com> <303e1d290907141052l32389d1cueb2c6d75f5afd368@mail.gmail.com> <44bc43d50907160116p7617ccf9t78675591a07e0f76@mail.gmail.com> <303e1d290907170628p747ffad2gd5a19d74b3acb905@mail.gmail.com> <87vdlri69j.fsf@talisman.home>

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Richard
Sandiford<rdsandiford@googlemail.com> wrote:

>> Why are you removing can_create_pseudo_p() from the split check?

> But now that the predicate only allows "real" offsettable operands,
> "split this if we can create pseudos, or if the address is (really)
> offsettable" reduces to true, because the predicates are checked
> before the split condition.

Thanks for the clarification.

The second patch also is okay.

Thanks, David

References:
- [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Use RTX_AUTOINC in rs6000 predicates.md
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]