This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PING [testsuite]: Tidy up testsuite handling of LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:57:13 -0700
- Subject: Re: PING [testsuite]: Tidy up testsuite handling of LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- References: <877hyy130x.fsf@talisman.home> <1246384607.5970.8.camel@janis-laptop> <87zlbp1sa6.fsf@talisman.home> <6dc9ffc80906301520u78a16cafpeb1fcd737a1f9f9@mail.gmail.com> <6dc9ffc80907091949w49d02959r34117769c0e056@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:49 PM, H.J. Lu<hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:20 PM, H.J. Lu<hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Richard
>> Sandiford<rdsandiford@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com> writes:
>>>> On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 09:42 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>>> Ping for this patch:
>>>>>
>>>>> ? ? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00151.html
>>>>>
>>>>> (which should probably have had [testsuite] in the header, sorry).
>>>>
>>>> Good grief, it already had "testsuite" in the header twice! ?I don't
>>>> know how I missed it.
>>>>
>>>> This is an area with which I'm not comfortable, but the patch looks
>>>> much better thought-out than what was there before, so OK.
>>>
>>> Thanks, applied. ?I agree this is a bit of a tender area, so please
>>> shout if I've broken something.
>>>
>>
>> It may have caused:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40601
>>
>
> It also caused:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40707
>
It also caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40709
--
H.J.