This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 19:45:03 +0200
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619
References: <4A4EDB57.1070800@redhat.com> <4A4F3C79.2060707@oracle.com> <4A4F83C4.4040909@redhat.com> <6dc9ffc80907040959s7bd8e22am8af4fe27ea95aff1@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000907041004g6b598303yd6970ee5ef7dd6f0@mail.gmail.com> <4B3954CA-7FA0-4F22-89C4-FC7912E66DB1@oracle.com>

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Paolo Carlini<paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> All our spectesters fail to build libstdc++ (they are not bootstrapping
>> though)
>> with the error Paolo reported as well.
>>>
>>>
>
> Indeed, like Richard, I saw the failure for a --disable-bootstrap build, not
> a normal bootstrap, sorry about that.

It seems to reproduce with

../trunk/configure --disable-nls --enable-languages=c++
--disable-multilib --enable-checking=release

but not with --enable-checking.  So likely sth is wrong in the non-checking
variant of the C++ frontend.

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- C++ PATCH for c++/40619
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/40619
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]