This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Refine rules for function versioning

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:23:18 -0700
Subject: Re: Refine rules for function versioning
References: <4A451751.7070605@redhat.com> <6dc9ffc80906261509s4e087c23y49fbe24554f37df1@mail.gmail.com> <4A4572B3.7080407@redhat.com> <84fc9c000906270507y71f0a6bdsda1487a987474dba@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/27/2009 05:07 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Richard Henderson<rth@redhat.com> wrote:
On 06/26/2009 03:09 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40565
Hmph.  IPA-CP now working as intended on tests that didn't expect it. Fixed
thus.
Are you sure you tested that patch?

Bah. No, not a full test. It was the last thing I did before running out the door. Of course...

r~

References:
- Refine rules for function versioning
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Refine rules for function versioning
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Refine rules for function versioning
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Refine rules for function versioning
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]