This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vtab] Permit coalescing of user variables


On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>> On Jun ?2, 2009, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jun ?1, 2009, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a reason we can't leave the current default behaviour the way
>>>>> it is, and have the VTA code simple enable the "best" choices for it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We don't want options used to control generation of debug information
>>>> (say the option that enables or disables VTA) to change the generated
>>>> code (say enable or disable coalescing), do we? ?This would be as bad as
>>>> -g/-g0 generating different code.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I don't see the point of the options either, but I don't see
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Me neither, and I am opposed to adding it.
>>>
>>
>> I'm missing your rationale here as well. ?It would help if you at least
>> voiced what you suggest we do instead.
>>
>>
>
> I think we are simply proposing that when VTA code is added and enabled, the
> default behaviour is then changed such that we do this coalescing. ?Until
> then it stays with the current tradeoffs. no options required...
>
> At least that's all I meant.

Right, this is what I would suggest as well.

Richard.

> Andrew
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]