This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] First attempt at unwind epilogue support for powerpc{,64}
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:45:18 +0930
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] First attempt at unwind epilogue support for powerpc{,64}
- References: <20090602171015.GM18874@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:10:15PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> +CFI_STARTPROC
> +CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER (11)
> +CFI_OFFSET (65, 4)
> +CFI_OFFSET (14, -72)
> +CFI_OFFSET (15, -68)
> +CFI_OFFSET (16, -64)
> +CFI_OFFSET (17, -60)
> +CFI_OFFSET (18, -56)
> +CFI_OFFSET (19, -52)
> +CFI_OFFSET (20, -48)
> +CFI_OFFSET (21, -44)
> +CFI_OFFSET (22, -40)
> +CFI_OFFSET (23, -36)
> +CFI_OFFSET (24, -32)
> +CFI_OFFSET (25, -28)
> +CFI_OFFSET (26, -24)
> +CFI_OFFSET (27, -20)
> +CFI_OFFSET (28, -16)
> +CFI_OFFSET (29, -12)
> +CFI_OFFSET (30, -8)
Isn't most of the above untrue for _restgpr_31_x?
> +CFI_OFFSET (31, -4)
> HIDDEN_FUNC(_restgpr_14_x) lwz 14,-72(11) /* restore gp registers */
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM