This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [3/8] Fix premature post-increment in collect2.c


Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> writes:
> Richard Sandiford <richards@transitive.com> writes:
>
>> 	* collect2.c (ignore_library): Avoid premature post-increment
>> 	and null deference.
>>
>> Index: gcc/collect2.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/collect2.c	2009-06-02 13:05:46.000000000 +0100
>> +++ gcc/collect2.c	2009-06-02 13:06:04.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -2444,8 +2444,9 @@ static int ignore_library (const char *)
>>  ignore_library (const char *name)
>>  {
>>    const char *const *p = &aix_std_libs[0];
>> -  while (*p++ != NULL)
>> -    if (! strcmp (name, *p)) return 1;
>> +  while (*p)
>> +    if (! strcmp (name, *p++))
>> +      return 1;
>
> Burying the postincrement in the argument to a function call doesn't
> seem like a big step forward in clarity.  I would write something more
> like
>
>   const char *const *p;
>   for (p = &aix_std_libs[0]; *p != NULL; ++p)
>     if (strcmp (name, *p) == 0)
>       return 1;
>
> I won't insist on that change.  This is OK either way.

Thanks, applied with the suggested change.

Richard


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]