This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [arm,vxworks]: neon patch

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:05:03 +0100
Subject: Re: [arm,vxworks]: neon patch
References: <4A1BEDA9.8050901@codesourcery.com> <de8d50360905260759j67c0c1c8l4580602f3b975b02@mail.gmail.com>

Andrew Pinski wrote:

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> wrote:

I've applied this obvious patch of Richard's for a vxworks issue.  Richard
developed this when at CodeSourcery, and auditing our sources indicated it
never made it upstream (possibly because neon hadn't gone upstream at that
time).

Richard, if you think it inappropriate to have your now-defunct csl email
address attached to this, please change the changelog entry as you see fit.


Isn't stdint.h supposed to be always available now?  So I think this
patch no longer applies and is incorrect.

*supposed* is the operative word here. *vxworks* is the important factor you may have missed.

nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::         CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [arm,vxworks]: neon patch
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- [arm,vxworks]: neon patch
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [arm,vxworks]: neon patch
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]