This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] PATCH PR c++/40007

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:45:17 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFA] PATCH PR c++/40007
References: <20090522204857.15dcced9@tutu>

Dodji Seketeli wrote:

For class templates this patch stores the typedefs needing
access checking to the associated RECORD_TYPE. It just appends the list
of typedefs to the template_info list node.

For function template the patch stores the typedefs in the
associated TEMPLATE_DECL, just as what was being done before.

Why not do the same thing for functions?

When can TI_TEMPLATE be something other than a template?

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] PATCH PR c++/40007
  - From: Dodji Seketeli

References:
- [RFA] PATCH PR c++/40007
  - From: Dodji Seketeli

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]