This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH take 2]: Integrate GCC with the complex math library MPC (middle-end)
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> > This patch is "take 2" of the middle-end bits for the MPC integration
>> > originally posted and explained here:
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00672.html
>> >
>> > Tested in conjunction with the MPC configury patch, no regressions.
>> >
>> > Note: it's safe to install this patch separately from the other MPC bits.
>> >
>> > Okay for mainline?
>>
>> What about testcases? ?(It will be of course interesting with
>> "optional" stuff ...)
>> Richard.
>
> The testcase bits were posted in March along with the original MPC set.
> I just hadn't got around to reposting it yet. ?It included code to detect
> if MPC was available and only exercise the MPC optimizations if the
> library was activated:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00675.html
>
> Since the plan is to hard-require MPC before gcc-4.5 is released, we could
> remove the auto-detect and live with the testsuite failures for those
> people who choose not to get MPC until it's mandatory. ?Or keep the
> auto-detect until then. ?What's your preference?
The auto-detect is fine with me, but Janis has to approve it.
The middle-end patch is ok. The doc patch as well.
Thanks,
Richard.
>
> Similarly, the original doc bits are here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00674.html
>
>
> I don't think either patch has changed since the originals.
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--Kaveh
>