This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ping 3] New port: Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf)


On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 21:32 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> > 1. Wouldn't *all* of cgen need to be included, as the GPL requires
> >    that all scripts and such for building be included?  CGEN is not a
> >    normal part of the OS or OS's development tools.
> 
> That was not the conclusion from previous discussions; we don't include 
> all of autoconf, or automake, or flex, or bison when we had bison parsers, 
> or makeinfo when distributing info files, or OCaml for the NEON intrinsics 
> files that have generators written in that language.  We include the 
> sources and the generated files, but not the generator tools where those 
> are independent programs rather than a GCC-specific program for the 
> particular file being generated.

If DJ is to include the CGEN source files, I think we will need a new
top-level cpu directory (like src/cpu).  In fact, these two directories
might as well be synchronised as other top-level directories are.

We have never encountered this situation before because this is the
first time that CGEN has generated something compiled into GCC.

Cheers, Ben

-- 
Ben Elliston <bje@au.ibm.com>
Australia Development Lab, IBM


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]