This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 22:46:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905011332280.32657@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905011347070.32657@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <571f6b510905011346v45ce27aeq81ae705c90ffabf0@mail.gmail.com> <20090503.133412.81833464.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>> config/sh/sh.c:#include "c-pragma.h"
>
> FYI, I've confirmed that there are no problems without
> this line for sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Regards,
> ? ? ? ?kaz
>
And I have successfully bootstrapped with this patch below, which I'll
commit as obvious.
Kaz, can you commit a patch for sh.c?
Ciao!
Steven
Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c (revision 147249)
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
#include "insn-codes.h"
#include "insn-attr.h"
#include "flags.h"
-#include "c-common.h"
#include "except.h"
#include "function.h"
#include "recog.h"