This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR c++/28152 Diagnostic about wrong use _Complex prints __complex__
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:12:34 +0200
- Subject: Re: PR c++/28152 Diagnostic about wrong use _Complex prints __complex__
- References: <6c33472e0808221726o23dd7645j58b41e170443ec33@mail.gmail.com> <6c33472e0810210847t6112b83dkceb2a356d3c2cfdb@mail.gmail.com> <6c33472e0905030949k52035195q95e91e157496b6a2@mail.gmail.com> <49FE0E1F.7020508@codesourcery.com>
2009/5/3 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>:
> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>
>> ? ? ? (cp_parser_attribute_list): Use the canonical spelling for
>> ? ? ? keywords in attributes.
>
> Why do we want to use the canonical spelling for keywords, rather than
> whatever the user actually said in the source?
Following this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01400.html
otherwise g++.dg/ext/attrib34.C would break.
Cheers,
Manuel.